Matthias Kuentzel: Spreading Mis-Information.

Matthias Kuentzel: Spreading Mis-Information.

Quote:

Matthias Kuentzel In both Gaza and Lebanon the possibility existed of a normalisation of relations with Israel, leading in all probability to an economic upturn. So why do Hizbollah and Hamas prioritise weapons and war rather than peace and welfare?

Let’s be honest, the war with Lebanon was “pre-planned”.

Quote:

Israel’s prime minister has said that the strategy used in last year’s war with Lebanon was drawn up months in advance, an Israeli newspaper reports. According to Haaretz, Ehud Olmert said it was decided at least four months before that any kidnap of Israeli troops on its border would trigger war. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/mid…st/6431637.stm

Surely, you should be asking why Israel was planning war in the first place rather than peace?

Matthias Kuentzel Un-Academic Lies

Matthias Kuentzel Un-Academic Lies

Quote:

Matthias Kuentzel Nobody here will have forgotten the horrors of the most recent Middle East war, which took place this summer. But who still remembers the hopes of the previous summer, in 2005, when Israel, despite massive internal resistance, pulled all its troops and settlers out of Gaza? Back then many people hoped that the Gaza strip would develop into a model Palestinian region that could form the nucleus of a Palestinian state alongside Israel.

Really?

Quote:

Although Israel withdrew from Gaza more than a year ago, its control over the lives of Palestinians there is in some ways even tighter than before, a new report by an Israeli human rights organisation says. In the days after Israeli troops and settlers pulled out of the territory, the then Israeli leader, Ariel Sharon addressed the United Nations. He declared “the end of Israeli control over and responsibility for the Gaza Strip”. But a study by Gisha challenges that claim. The organisation says it aims to “protect the fundamental rights of Palestinians living in the Occupied Territories by imposing human rights law as a limitation on the behaviour of Israel’s military”. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/mid…st/6270331.stm

For an “academic” to spout such baseless lies is unbelievable who without looking at the facts on the ground takes the Israeli propaganda at face value without question, without proof.

The fact remains that no matter what Matthias Kuentzel says, the fact is Hitler was a German. Not a Palestinian, or a Muslim but a Christian German.

Nazism did not grow in Palestine but in Germany, Matthias Kuentzel birth place.

University is accused of censoring anti-Semitic Islam lecture

The University of Leeds was accused of infringing free speech last night when it cancelled a lecture on “Islamic anti-Semitism” by a German academic.

Matthias Köntzel arrived at the university yesterday morning to begin a three-day programme of lectures and seminars, but was told that it had been called off on “security grounds”.

Dr Köntzel, a political scientist who has lectured around the world on the antiSemitic ideology of Islamist groups, told The Times there were concerns that he would be attacked. He said that he was “outraged” that his meetings had been cancelled and had yet to receive an explanation.

The university, which acted after complaints from Muslim students, denied that it was interfering with the academic freedom of Dr Köntzel, and said that proper arrangements for stewarding the meeting had not been made.

The lecture, entitled “Hitler’s Legacy: Islamic antiSemitism in the Middle East”, was organised by the university’s German department and publicised three weeks ago. A large attendance had been expected.

Dr Köntzel, a former adviser to the German Green Party, said: “I have been told that it has had to be cancelled for security reasons. It seems there were concerns that there could be violence against my person.

“I have lectured in lots of countries on this subject. I gave the same talk at Yale University recently, and this is the first time I have been invited to lecture in the UK. Nothing like this has ever happened before – this is censorship.

“It is a controversial area but I am accustomed to debate. I value the integrity of academic debate and I feel that it really is in danger here. This is a very important subject and if you cannot address it on university property, then what is a university for?”

Dr Köntzel, a research associate at the Vidal Sassoon International Centre for the Study of Antisemitism at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, said that he had been shown two e-mails that had been received, which objected to his lecture.

One, apparently written by a student, said: “As a Muslim and an Arab this has come to me as a great shock. The only intention that you have for doing this is to increase hatred as I clearly regard it as an open racist attack.”

Ahmed Sawalem, president of the university’s student Islamic Society, confirmed that he had contacted the office of Professor Michael Arthur, the Vice-Chancellor, to register an official complaint.

“The title of the talk is provocative and I have searched the internet to read his writings and they are not very pleasant,” Mr Sawalem said. “We are not opposed to freedom of expression. We just sent a complaint, we did not ask for the talk to be cancelled.”

The university authorities contacted the German department on Tuesday and asked for a change in the title. The department agreed to relabel the talk as “The Nazi Legacy: the export of antiSemitism to the Middle East”.

Yesterday morning, the head of the German department, Professor Stuart Taberner, was called to a meeting with the Vice-Chancellor’s staff and the head of security. After the meeting, Dr Köntzel’s lecture and workshops were cancelled.

Annette Seidel Arpaci, an academic in the German department, said: “This is an academic talk by a scholar, it is not a political rally. The sudden cancellation is a sell-out of academic freedom, especially freedom of speech, at the University of Leeds.” A spokes-woman for the university said that it valued freedom of speech and added that the cancellation of the meeting had been a bureaucratic issue.

“The decision to cancel the meeting has nothing to do with academic freedom, freedom of speech, antiSemitism or Islam-ophobia, and those claiming that is the case are making mischief,” she said.

What he wrote

“ AntiSemitism based on the notion of a Jewish world conspiracy is not rooted in Islamic tradition but, rather, in European ideological models. The decisive transfer of this ideology to the Muslim world took place between 1937 and 1945 under the impact of Nazi propaganda . . . “Although Islamism is an independent, antiSemitic, antimodern mass movement, its main early promoters, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and the Mufti and the Qassamites in Palestine, were supported financially and ideologically by agencies of the German National Socialist Government.”

Jewish Political Studies Review, spring 2005

Reply from Neo-Nazi Blogger – Little Bull[shitter]dog

The little facist from the Little Bulldogs has tried his best to rub off the facts that he is a little facist. Some of his counter-points are so illogicial that it gives a god damn bad name to the BNP.

Here is what he states:

Quote:

1) There is an obvious difference between “monitoring RADICAL Islam” and “Keeping a Close Watch on Jewish Communities”. I monitor only the radical Muslims which is not racist, wheread Jew Watch monitors all Jews thinking that all Jews are evil.

First and foremost learn how to spell.

Secondly, your point that you only monitor “radicals”. Prove it to me then.

If any dumb facist looks at your blog he can clearly see that it’s another version of the facist British National Party outpost.

Or If you don’t believe that there is an “obvious difference” from your neo-nazi blog than Jew Watch, why have you been mentioned and congratulated on the well known right-wing neo-conservative blog Little Green Footballs?

Or if you still believe your not a neo-nazi-zionist why link to a blog which calls itself “Islamophobic Blog” and stays true to its name by spreading even more hate filled posts about Islam & Muslims.

Or if like you say you only concentrate on “radicals” then please tell me, which organisation which speaks out against Israel have you not called a radical.

Are all those organisations which don’t want to see the braions of little children being splattered aginst their cots Radicals?

Actually that is your neo-nazi definiation. Anyone who dislikes Israeli’s actions agianst defenceless children must be a radical, which in your neo-nazi language would mean that any condemantion of the Nazi extermination of the Jews must be a radical as well.

Just to prove my point, here are the radical Muslims:

Quote:

“Islam’s borders are bloody and so are its innards. The fundamental problem for the West is not Islamic fundamentalism. It is Islam, a different civilisation whose people are convinced of the superiority of their culture and are obsessed with the inferiority of their power.”

and you further go onto state:

Quote:

Will the MCB condemn him for this? Will we see more violence to disprove him? Time will tell…

Now if I replace the word Islam with Judaism & Muslim would Jew wouldn’t this exactly sound like a quote from Jew Watch?

Quote:

Quote: “Judaism’s borders are bloody and so are its innards. The fundamental problem for the West is not Jewish fundamentalism. It is Judaism, a different civilisation whose people are convinced of the superiority of their culture and are obsessed with the inferiority of their power.”

Counter-Point is bull.

Now Point Two:

Quote:

2) The fact that a member of the BNP wants to contact me can in no way incriminate me. You ignore my comments that show my opposition to the BNP. Trying to claim I am a racist because someone who is asks to get in contact shows how much you have to stretch to find anything.

Are you serious? Isn’t it shocking that a neo-nazi contacted you? There must be something whcih he agreed on your blog for him to approach you to help him surely, spread more hatred against Muslims?

Don’t you find it suprising that the Neo-Nazi’s BNP members are visiting your hate filled blog?

Point two, come on there must be something the BNP agree with

Will be replying to your other 3 points shortly, not sure if it’s worth while because your utterly just a Neo-Nazi who by the looks of it is a unemployed fascists who is spending time on neo-nazi websites such as the BNP.

Little Bulldogs (Neo-Nazi Zionist) – Exposed

I just thought I’d share some facinating research into this Neo-Nazi supporter who recently placed an article saying he doesn’t hate Muslim’s but his blog is filled with hate of Muslims and Islam.

I have just done basic one with main points.

 

Quote:

I have become aware that members of the MPACUK forum have identified this site as a far-right, fascist, Islamophobic etc etc site. Please allow me to reply to these allegations.

Come on let’s be honest and truthful about it. You are a far-right, neo-Nazi dipstick.

Description of Blog from Anti-Semitic Website:

His Neo-Zio-Nazi Blog title is a clear-cut copy and paste on Jew watch:

His Blog:

 

Quote:

Monitoring Radical Islam in Britain and its Left Wing Allies

Jew Watch:

 

Quote:

“Keeping a Close Watch on Jewish Communities & Organizations Worldwide.”

The BNP Connection:

While, making a final entry in his blog for his commitment at work, one of his favourite neo-Nazi visitors tries to get into touch:

 

Quote:

I am trying to get in touch with you. Kindly reply to economics@bnp.org.uk.Best Regards, Alan Goodacre Alan Goodacre | 01.16.07 – 11:51 pm | #

Further research into Alan Goodacre reveals that indeed he is a member of the Neo-Nazi British National Party and head of the Economics Section of the Neo-Nazi Party, which can be all revealed here http://www.bnp.org.uk/articles/trade_deficit.html.

Planting Anti-Semitism & Promoting Terrorism at MPACUK:

Personally, I did not find it surprising that he admitted to placing Anti-Semitic comments at the MPACUK section, which by the looks of it did not get published because they are moderating the comments.

The quote:

 

Quote:

However, the trick here is to destroy MPACUK rather than counter it. This can be done by posting messages that are extreme – whether they be overtly anti-Semitic or encouraging terrorism and genocide.

What is shocking is his admitting to promoting terrorism, which has been reported to the police who have said that they are looking into the matter.

Hatred of Politically Active Muslims

In another post he highlights his hatred of those Muslims who believe in Islam (just like the Jewish people before) and who work hard to serve their children:

 

Quote:

No ChecksThe Home Office has revealed that their staff do not have to declare whether they are members of radical Islamist group Hizb-ut-Tahrir. This information came to light after newspapers discovered that a senior IT worker was a leading figure in the group. Yet one more thing the Government is failing on. Hat Tip: USS Neverdock

Since, when did we turn back to the age of Hitler? This same method was employed by the Nazi’s to get rid of prominent Jewish members in businesses, because of their high skills.

Linking to Hitler Supporting Newspaper:

The article above about the members of Hizb ut Tahrir working to provide for their families, itself is linked to an a newspaper which in the early 1934 Rothermere and the Mail was sympathetic to Oswald Mosley and the British Union of Fascists.

Rothermere was a friend and supporter of both Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler, which influenced the Mail’s political stance toward them up to 1939. During this period it was the only British newspaper to consistently support the German Nazi Party

Rothermere visited and corresponded with Hitler on many occasions. On 1 October 1938, Rothermere sent Hitler a telegram in support of Germany’s invasion of the Sudetenland, and expressing the hope that ‘Adolf the Great’ would become a popular figure in Britain.

In 1937, the Mail’s chief war correspondent George Ward Price, to whom Mussolini once personally wrote in support of him and the newspaper, published a book, I Know These Dictators, in defence of Hitler and Mussolini.

Spear Heading the Hatred against Muslims

This Neo-Nazi hate monger states:

 

Quote:

we do not report on random crimes that happen to have been committed by a Muslim. To set out to identify a criminal as a Muslim where there is no indication that he acted due to his religion is to stir up unnecessary religious tension. However, when a Muslim commits a crime in the name of Islam it is most certainly not racist to mention it.

If you look at his neo-Nazi linked blog you could find entry after entry solely on Muslims.

1. Muslim’s being forced out of work – he has backed, and advertised
2. An innocent Muslim being arrested then released then re-arrested on no proof sent from the Bush Administration – He backed and advertised
3. Muslim and Jewish people wishing to live by their religion – He attacked and promoted hared.

I can go on and on but I think this is sufficient to show the true colours of this Neo-Nazi Israel supporter.